↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Twitter Sentiment on Stock Price Returns

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
669 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Effects of Twitter Sentiment on Stock Price Returns
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0138441
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Social media are increasingly reflecting and influencing behavior of other complex systems. In this paper we investigate the relations between a well-known micro-blogging platform Twitter and financial markets. In particular, we consider, in a period of 15 months, the Twitter volume and sentiment about the 30 stock companies that form the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index. We find a relatively low Pearson correlation and Granger causality between the corresponding time series over the entire time period. However, we find a significant dependence between the Twitter sentiment and abnormal returns during the peaks of Twitter volume. This is valid not only for the expected Twitter volume peaks (e.g., quarterly announcements), but also for peaks corresponding to less obvious events. We formalize the procedure by adapting the well-known "event study" from economics and finance to the analysis of Twitter data. The procedure allows to automatically identify events as Twitter volume peaks, to compute the prevailing sentiment (positive or negative) expressed in tweets at these peaks, and finally to apply the "event study" methodology to relate them to stock returns. We show that sentiment polarity of Twitter peaks implies the direction of cumulative abnormal returns. The amount of cumulative abnormal returns is relatively low (about 1-2%), but the dependence is statistically significant for several days after the events.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 669 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 657 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 13%
Student > Bachelor 72 11%
Researcher 46 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 5%
Other 82 12%
Unknown 248 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 123 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 105 16%
Computer Science 85 13%
Engineering 30 4%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Other 42 6%
Unknown 268 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2026.
All research outputs
#459,769
of 34,325,395 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,958
of 224,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,862
of 312,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#112
of 5,829 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,325,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,829 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.