You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluación de Foldscope, un microscopio de papel basado en origami útil para la identificación de garrapatas Rhipicephalus sanguineus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Universitaria, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.15174/au.2018.2134 |
| Authors |
Sandra Guadalupe Parada-Sánchez, Cecilia Gabriela Meléndez-Salcido, Martín Renato Hernández-Castaños, Said Rafael Prado-Ávila, Jaime Raúl Adame Gallegos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Acta Universitaria
#6
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,578
of 359,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Universitaria
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.