↓ Skip to main content

‘Nicanor y la Violeta’: Un análisis crítico del uso del artículo definido ante nombres propios masculinos y femeninos

Overview of attention for article published in "Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Literatura y Filosofía ", December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 137)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Nicanor y la Violeta’: Un análisis crítico del uso del artículo definido ante nombres propios masculinos y femeninos
Published in
"Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Literatura y Filosofía ", December 2020
DOI 10.15443/rl3018
Authors

Leonardo Aliaga Rovira, Patricia Avilés Retamal, Domingo Román Montes de Oca, María José Serrano Insunza, Camila Colicheo Cabrera, Francisco Soto Cáceres

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,269,566
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from "Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Literatura y Filosofía "
#5
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,718
of 518,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Literatura y Filosofía "
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.