↓ Skip to main content

A multiobjective approach for non-discretionary variables in data envelopment analysis

Overview of attention for article published in DYNA, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multiobjective approach for non-discretionary variables in data envelopment analysis
Published in
DYNA, February 2016
DOI 10.15446/dyna.v83n195.45396
Authors

Lidia Angulo-Meza, Joo Carlos Correia Baptista Soares-de Mello, Silvio Figueiredo-Gomes-Jnior

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,913
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from DYNA
#42
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,520
of 313,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from DYNA
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.