↓ Skip to main content

Aporte de la universalización al logro de la equidad en salud

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Salud Pública, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aporte de la universalización al logro de la equidad en salud
Published in
Revista de Salud Pública, March 2017
DOI 10.15446/rsap.v19n2.55696
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Eduardo Bejarano Daza, Diego Fernando Hernández Losada

Abstract

This article presents a characterization of the different approaches to the analysis of equity in terms of equality, justice, distribution of resources, provision of services and risk management, based on the definition provided by different authors in the past two decades on this topic. It is also evident that the implementation of universalization policies in health programs has been a strategy for achieving equity, grounded on liberal approaches such as increased coverage, and egalitarian perspectives such as the universalization of access. Health reforms based on these equity approaches have not been enough to achieve equality yet because they maintain segregation and allow different types of services to different population groups, which is far from being a truly universal and equitable system. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the relationship between the principles of universalization and equity to understand the application of both principles in the health system of Colombia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 20%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,481,550
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Salud Pública
#58
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,242
of 327,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Salud Pública
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them