↓ Skip to main content

On Vastness and Variability: Cultural Transmission, Historicity, and the Paleoindian Record in Eastern South America

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On Vastness and Variability: Cultural Transmission, Historicity, and the Paleoindian Record in Eastern South America
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201520140219
Pubmed ID
Authors

ASTOLFO G.M. ARAUJO

Abstract

Eastern South America, or what is today Brazilian territory, poses interesting questions about the early human occupation of the Americas. Three totally distinct and contemporaneous lithic technologies, dated between 11,000 and 10,000 14C BP, are present in different portions of the country: the Umbu tradition in the south, with its formal bifacial industry, with well-retouched scrapers and bifacial points; the Itaparica tradition in the central-west / northwest, totally unifacial, whose only formal artifacts are limaces; and the "Lagoa Santa" industry, completely lacking any formal artifacts, composed mainly of small quartz flakes. Our data suggests that these differences are not related to subsistence or raw-material constraints, but rather to different cultural norms and transmission of strongly divergent chaînes opératoires. Such diversity in material culture, when viewed from a cultural transmission (CT) theory standpoint, seems at odds with a simple Clovis model as the origin of these three cultural traditions given the time elapsed since the first Clovis ages and the expected population structure of the early South American settlers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 33%
Arts and Humanities 5 15%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%