↓ Skip to main content

Animal models in biological and biomedical research - experimental and ethical concerns

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
750 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Animal models in biological and biomedical research - experimental and ethical concerns
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, January 2019
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201720170238
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Animal models have been used in experimental research to increase human knowledge and contribute to finding solutions to biological and biomedical questions. However, increased concern for the welfare of the animals used, and a growing awareness of the concept of animal rights, has brought a greater focus on the related ethical issues. In this review, we intend to give examples on how animals are used in the health research related to some major health problems in Brazil, as well as to stimulate discussion about the application of ethics in the use of animals in research and education, highlighting the role of National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (Conselho Nacional de Controle de Experimentação Animal - CONCEA) in these areas. In 2008, Brazil emerged into a new era of animal research regulation, with the promulgation of Law 11794, previously known as the Arouca Law, resulting in an increased focus, and rapid learning experience, on questions related to all aspects of animal experimentation. The law reinforces the idea that animal experiments must be based on ethical considerations and integrity-based assumptions, and provides a regulatory framework to achieve this. This review describes the health research involving animals and the current Brazilian framework for regulating laboratory animal science, and hopes to help to improve the awareness of the scientific community of these ethical and legal rules.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 750 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 750 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 116 15%
Student > Master 62 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 5%
Researcher 24 3%
Other 88 12%
Unknown 378 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 3%
Neuroscience 24 3%
Other 114 15%
Unknown 402 54%