You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meningioma associated with non-traumatic subdural hematoma: an outstanding appearance of this common intracranial tumor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0004-282x20130052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antônio José da Rocha, Nelson Saade, Adriano Zanon da Silva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Other | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#270
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,477
of 206,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.