↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and correlates of sleep disorders in Parkinson’s disease: a polysomnographic study

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and correlates of sleep disorders in Parkinson’s disease: a polysomnographic study
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2015
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20140228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Alatriste-Booth, Mayela Rodríguez-Violante, Azyadeh Camacho-Ordoñez, Amin Cervantes-Arriaga

Abstract

Objective Sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease are very common. Polysomnography (PSG) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis. The aim of the present study is to assess the prevalence of nocturnal sleep disorders diagnosed by polysomnography and to determine the associated clinical factors. Method A total of 120 patients with Parkinson's disease were included. All patients underwent a standardized overnight, single night polysomnography. Results Ninety-four (78.3%) patients had an abnormal PSG. Half of the patients fulfilled criteria for sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS); rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD) was present in 37.5%. Characteristics associated with SAHS were age (p = 0.049) and body mass index (p = 0.016). Regarding RBD, age (p < 0.001), left motor onset (p = 0.047) and levodopa equivalent dose (p = 0.002) were the main predictors. Conclusion SAHS and RBD were the most frequent sleep disorders. Higher levodopa equivalent dose and body mass index appear to be risk factors for RBD and SAHS, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 3%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 46%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,958,630
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#62
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,584
of 271,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.