↓ Skip to main content

Preventing bleeding and thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preventing bleeding and thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing surgery
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20150085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles André

Abstract

Neurologists feel uneasy when asked about temporary anticoagulant interruption for surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Rational decisions can be made based on current scientific evidence. Method Critical review of international guidelines and selected references pertaining to bleeding and thromboembolism during periods of oral anticoagulant interruption. Results Withholding oral anticoagulants leads to an increased risk of perioperative thromboembolism, depending on factors such as age, renal and liver function, previous ischemic events, heart failure etc. Surgeries are associated with a variable risk of bleeding - from minimal to very high. Individualized decisions about preoperative drug suspension, bridging therapy with heparin and time to restart oral anticoagulants after hemostasis can significantly reduce these opposing risks. Conclusion Rational decisions can be made after discussion with all Health care team professionals involved and consideration of patient fears and expectations. Formal written protocols should help managing antithrombotic treatment during this delicate period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,535,626
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#607
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,721
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.