↓ Skip to main content

Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with the Zika virus outbreak in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
9 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with the Zika virus outbreak in Brazil
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Masiêro Araujo, Maria Lucia Brito Ferreira, Osvaldo JM Nascimento

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is now considered an emerging flavivirosis, with a first large outbreak registered in the Yap Islands in 2007. In 2013, a new outbreak was reported in the French Polynesia, with associated cases of neurological complications including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). The incidence of GBS has increased in Brazil since 2015, what is speculated to be secondary to the ZIKV infection outbreak. The gold-standard test for detection of acute ZIKV infection is the polymerase-chain reaction technique, an essay largely unavailable in Brazil. The diagnosis of GBS is feasible even in resource-limited areas using the criteria proposed by the GBS Classification Group, which is based solely on clinical grounds. Further understanding on the relationship of ZIKV with neurological complications is a research urgency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 16%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#292
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,762
of 312,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.