↓ Skip to main content

Depression, sexuality and fibromyalgia syndrome: clinical findings and correlation to hematological parameters

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Depression, sexuality and fibromyalgia syndrome: clinical findings and correlation to hematological parameters
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, November 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160141
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate sexuality and depression in women with FM compared with controls and to correlate the findings with hematological parameters. 33 women with FM and 19 healthy women were included and evaluated with the following instruments: Female Sexual Function Index, Beck Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale, medical history and laboratory exams. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction (P = 0.007) and depression (P < 0.001) were higher in the study group than in the control group; they were positively correlated (P = 0.023). The study group showed lower serum concentrations of testosterone, free T4, antinuclear factor, and lower blood hemoglobin and hematocrit. FM was associated with high scores of sexual dysfunction and depression, and there were correlations with hematological parameters. We suggest the involvement of immune-inflammatory mediators and FM, which need further investigation to understand their role in FM syndrome and its comorbidities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Psychology 9 15%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#25,768,666
of 32,046,026 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#1,196
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,485
of 326,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,046,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.