↓ Skip to main content

Presumed Zika virus-related congenital brain malformations: the spectrum of CT and MRI findings in fetuses and newborns

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Presumed Zika virus-related congenital brain malformations: the spectrum of CT and MRI findings in fetuses and newborns
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2017
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20170134
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The new epidemic of Zika virus infection raises grave concerns, especially with the increasingly-recognized link between emerging cases of microcephaly and this infectious disease. Besides small cranial dimensions, there are striking morphologic anomalies in the fetal brain. Key anomalies include cortical developmental malformations and a peculiar distribution of pathologic calcifications. These potentially indicate a new pattern of congenital central nervous system infection. Eight women underwent fetal MRI. Four infants also underwent postnatal CT. Five of the women underwent amniocentesis. All neonates were born with microcephaly. On fetal MRI, ventriculomegaly, marked reduction of white matter thickness, severe sylvian fissure simplification, abnormal sulcation, and diffuse volumetric loss of cerebellar hemispheres were consistently seen. On postnatal CT, diffuse subcortical and basal ganglia calcifications were observed. The Zika virus was detected in two amniocenteses by polymerase chain reaction assays. We hope to assist the medical community in recognizing the spectrum of encephalic changes related to congenital Zika virus infection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#9,959,279
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#402
of 1,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,719
of 359,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,661 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.