↓ Skip to main content

Pilates and aerobic training improve levels of depression, anxiety and quality of life in overweight and obese individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,669)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
468 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pilates and aerobic training improve levels of depression, anxiety and quality of life in overweight and obese individuals
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20170149
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To compare the effects of Pilates and walking on quality of life, depression, and anxiety levels. Sixty-three overweight/obese participants were randomly divided into: control (n = 20), walking (n = 21), and Pilates (n = 22) groups. Pilates and walking groups attended eight weeks of 60-minute exercise sessions three times per week. Quality of life, depression, and state- and trait-anxiety levels were evaluated before and after eight weeks of training. Scores of quality of life, depression, and trait-anxiety improved in the Pilates and walking groups. State-anxiety levels improved only in the walking group. Pilates and walking positively impact quality of life, depression and anxiety. The Pilates method could be used as an alternative to improve mood disorders in overweight/obese individuals.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 468 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 78 17%
Student > Master 57 12%
Researcher 24 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 4%
Other 58 12%
Unknown 213 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 77 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 10%
Sports and Recreations 49 10%
Psychology 21 4%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Other 35 7%
Unknown 226 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,480,611
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#25
of 1,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,042
of 491,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,669 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.