↓ Skip to main content

Terapia assistida com cães em pediatria oncológica: percepção de pais e enfermeiros

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 738)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Terapia assistida com cães em pediatria oncológica: percepção de pais e enfermeiros
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, December 2016
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebeca Lima Moreira, Fabiane do Amaral Gubert, Leidiane Minervina Moraes de Sabino, Jéssica Lima Benevides, Marcela Ariadne Braga Gomes Tomé, Mariana Cavalcante Martins, Mychelangela de Assis Brito

Abstract

to understand the perception of nursing staff professionals and legal guardians of children and adolescents with cancer regarding Assisted Therapy with dogs. qualitative study based on participant observation conducted with 16 participants in a reference hospital of child cancer. We applied an in-depth interview and interpreted the data according to a content analysis technique. the practice is admittedly beneficial to participants despite the fact they do not understand its true objectives and therapeutic applications. Participants only associate it with something distracting and entertaining without realizing the occurrence of a more complex process behind it, which comprises changes besides the emotional ones (more easily perceived). the perceptions of participants reinforce recommendations that can be applied in the hospital environment, also showing that the therapy in question can become an effective technology to promote the health of children and adolescents with cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 22%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 59 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 54 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Psychology 7 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 61 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,485,316
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#10
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,850
of 416,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them