You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cuidados paliativos e espiritualidade: revisao integrativa da literatura
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690324i |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla Braz Evangelista, Maria Emilia Limeira Lopes, Solange Fatima Geraldo da Costa, Patricia Serpa de Souza Batista, Jaqueline Brito Vidal Batista, Amanda Maritsa de Magalhães Oliveira |
| Abstract |
to analyze scientifi c articles published in international online journals about palliative care and spirituality. an integrative literature review with data collected in September 2014 from the LILACS, SCIELO, MEDLINE/PubMed, and IBECS databases. thirty-nine publications were identifi ed and their textual analysis facilitated through four thematic approaches: the meaning of spirituality in the context of palliative care; palliative care and spiritual support; spirituality and relief of pain and other symptoms in patients under palliative care; and instruments to evaluate the spiritual dimension of the scope of palliative care. this study examined the relevance of the spiritual dimension in the care of patients with palliative care and the need for developing new studies to disseminate knowledge about this topic. Palliative Care; Palliative Care at End of Live; Spirituality; Religion; Health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 131 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 15% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 134 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#41
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,810
of 353,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.