↓ Skip to main content

Approaches towards tick and tick-borne diseases control

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approaches towards tick and tick-borne diseases control
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, April 2013
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0014-2012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Domingos, Sandra Antunes, Lara Borges, Virgílio Estólio do Rosário

Abstract

Ticks are obligate haematophagous ectoparasites of wild and domestic animals as well as humans, considered to be second worldwide to mosquitoes as vectors of human diseases. Tick-borne diseases are responsible worldwide for great economic losses in terms of mortality and morbidity of livestock animals. This review concerns to the different tick and tick-parasites control methods having a major focus on vaccines. Control of tick infestations has been mainly based on the use of acaricides, a control measure with serious drawbacks, as responsible for the contamination of milk and meat products, as a selective factor for acaricide-resistant ticks and as an environmental contaminant. Research on alternatives to the use of acaricides is strongly represented by tick vaccines considered a more cost-effective and environmentally safe strategy. Vaccines based on the Bm86 tick antigen were used in the fi rst commercially available cattle tick vaccines and showed good results in reducing tick numbers, affecting weight and reproductive performance of female ticks which resulted in reduction of cattle tick populations over time and consequently lower reduction of the pathogen agents they carry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Other 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 28 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 54 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#178
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,511
of 212,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.