↓ Skip to main content

Approaches towards tick and tick-borne diseases control

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Approaches towards tick and tick-borne diseases control
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, April 2013
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0014-2012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ticks are obligate haematophagous ectoparasites of wild and domestic animals as well as humans, considered to be second worldwide to mosquitoes as vectors of human diseases. Tick-borne diseases are responsible worldwide for great economic losses in terms of mortality and morbidity of livestock animals. This review concerns to the different tick and tick-parasites control methods having a major focus on vaccines. Control of tick infestations has been mainly based on the use of acaricides, a control measure with serious drawbacks, as responsible for the contamination of milk and meat products, as a selective factor for acaricide-resistant ticks and as an environmental contaminant. Research on alternatives to the use of acaricides is strongly represented by tick vaccines considered a more cost-effective and environmentally safe strategy. Vaccines based on the Bm86 tick antigen were used in the fi rst commercially available cattle tick vaccines and showed good results in reducing tick numbers, affecting weight and reproductive performance of female ticks which resulted in reduction of cattle tick populations over time and consequently lower reduction of the pathogen agents they carry.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Other 12 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 59 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 67 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#8,378,037
of 26,544,284 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#188
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,413
of 214,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.