↓ Skip to main content

Induction and nosocomial dissemination of carbapenem and polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induction and nosocomial dissemination of carbapenem and polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0041-2015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilberto Gambero Gaspar, Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues, Leonardo Neves de Andrade, Ana Lúcia Darini, Roberto Martinez

Abstract

Polymyxins are antimicrobial agents capable of controlling carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. We report a cluster of four patients colonized or infected by polymyxin-resistant and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae. Three patients were hospitalized in adjacent wards, and two were admitted to the intensive care unit. The index case maintained prolonged intestinal colonization by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. Three patients received polymyxin B before the isolation of polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae. Colonization by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae and previous use of polymyxin B may be causally related to the development of polymyxin-resistant microorganisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 31%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#534
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,540
of 278,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.