↓ Skip to main content

Schistosomiasis in Southern Brazil 17 years after the confirmation of the first autochthonous case

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Schistosomiasis in Southern Brazil 17 years after the confirmation of the first autochthonous case
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0240-2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Demetrius da Silva Martins, Mariana Fabris Xavier, Franciéle de Souza Masiero, Juliana Cordeiro, Patrícia Jacqueline Thyssen

Abstract

Schistosomiasis, a parasitic disease, is an important public health issue in Brazil, particularly Northern Brazil. Since the first recorded occurrence of Biomphalaria glabrata in the States of Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, it has spread to South Brazil. Using the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (SINAN), we assessed the disease spread in Southern Brazil. In Rio Grande do Sul, nine localities had confirmed cases (n = 95, 2001-2013). We confirmed disease expansion to Southern Brazil. We demonstrated the effectiveness of SINAN to monitor notifiable diseases. Our results are useful to develop preventive actions for schistosomiasis control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#534
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,502
of 281,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.