↓ Skip to main content

Emerging alphaviruses in the Americas: Chikungunya and Mayaro

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 1,451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emerging alphaviruses in the Americas: Chikungunya and Mayaro
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, December 2014
DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0246-2014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Mayaro virus (MAYV) are emergent arthropod-borne viruses that produce outbreaks of acute febrile illness with arthropathy. Despite their different continental origins, CHIKV and MAYV are closely related and are components of the Semliki Forest Complex of the Alphavirus (Togaviridae). MAYV and, more recently, CHIKV, which are both transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, have resulted in severe public health problems in the Americas, including Brazil. In this review, we present aspects of the pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment of febrile illnesses produced by CHIKV and MAYV. We also discuss the epidemiological aspects and effects related to the prophylaxis of infections by both viruses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 378 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 18%
Student > Bachelor 65 17%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 63 16%
Unknown 83 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 103 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,974,210
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#24
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,193
of 421,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.