↓ Skip to main content

Women users of crack: systematic review of Brazilian literature

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women users of crack: systematic review of Brazilian literature
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/0047-2085000000107
Authors

Jéssica Limberger, Raísa da Silva do Nascimento, Jaluza Aimèe Schneider, Ilana Andretta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria
#133
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,148
of 312,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.