↓ Skip to main content

Intrusive versus domiciliated triatomines and the challenge of adapting vector control practices against Chagas disease

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intrusive versus domiciliated triatomines and the challenge of adapting vector control practices against Chagas disease
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, March 2015
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760140409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etienne Waleckx, Sébastien Gourbière, Eric Dumonteil

Abstract

Chagas disease prevention remains mostly based on triatomine vector control to reduce or eliminate house infestation with these bugs. The level of adaptation of triatomines to human housing is a key part of vector competence and needs to be precisely evaluated to allow for the design of effective vector control strategies. In this review, we examine how the domiciliation/intrusion level of different triatomine species/populations has been defined and measured and discuss how these concepts may be improved for a better understanding of their ecology and evolution, as well as for the design of more effective control strategies against a large variety of triatomine species. We suggest that a major limitation of current criteria for classifying triatomines into sylvatic, intrusive, domiciliary and domestic species is that these are essentially qualitative and do not rely on quantitative variables measuring population sustainability and fitness in their different habitats. However, such assessments may be derived from further analysis and modelling of field data. Such approaches can shed new light on the domiciliation process of triatomines and may represent a key tool for decision-making and the design of vector control interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1,012
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,748
of 277,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.