↓ Skip to main content

New insights on the development of fungal vaccines: from immunity to recent challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New insights on the development of fungal vaccines: from immunity to recent challenges
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, November 2015
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760150335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha P Medici, Maurizio Del Poeta

Abstract

Fungal infections are emerging as a major problem in part due to high mortality associated with systemic infections, especially in the case of immunocompromised patients. With the development of new treatments for diseases such as cancer and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome pandemic, the number of immunosuppressed patients has increased and, as a consequence, also the number of invasive fungal infections has increased. Several studies have proposed new strategies for the development of effective fungal vaccines. In addition, better understanding of how the immune system works against fungal pathogens has improved the further development of these new vaccination strategies. As a result, some fungal vaccines have advanced through clinical trials. However, there are still many challenges that prevent the clinical development of fungal vaccines that can efficiently immunise subjects at risk of developing invasive fungal infections. In this review, we will discuss these new vaccination strategies and the challenges that they present. In the future with proper investments, fungal vaccines may soon become a reality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 23 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,572,366
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#123
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,513
of 392,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.