↓ Skip to main content

Microbial control of arthropod-borne disease

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,502)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial control of arthropod-borne disease
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, February 2017
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760160373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel A Saldaña, Shivanand Hegde, Grant L Hughes

Abstract

Arthropods harbor a diverse array of microbes that profoundly influence many aspects of host biology, including vector competence. Additionally, symbionts can be engineered to produce molecules that inhibit pathogens. Due to their intimate association with the host, microbes have developed strategies that facilitate their transmission, either horizontally or vertically, to conspecifics. These attributes make microbes attractive agents for applied strategies to control arthropod-borne disease. Here we discuss the recent advances in microbial control approaches to reduce the burden of pathogens such as Zika, Dengue and Chikungunya viruses, and Trypanosome and Plasmodium parasites. We also highlight where further investigation is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 179 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,576,254
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#50
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,744
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.