↓ Skip to main content

Oral bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine against tuberculosis: why not?

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Oral bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine against tuberculosis: why not?
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, September 2014
DOI 10.1590/0074-0276140091
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is the only licensed vaccine for human use against tuberculosis (TB). Although controversy exists about its efficacy, the BCG vaccine is able to protect newborns and children against disseminated forms of TB, but fails to protect adults against active forms of TB. In the last few years, interest in the mucosal delivery route for the vaccine has been increasing owing to its increased capacity to induce protective immune responses both in the mucosal and the systemic immune compartments. Here, we show the importance of this route of vaccination in newly developed vaccines, especially for vaccines against TB.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 27 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,283,133
of 28,684,768 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#304
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,730
of 253,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,684,768 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.