↓ Skip to main content

Experiência inicial com terapia por pressão negativa por instilação em feridas complexas

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiência inicial com terapia por pressão negativa por instilação em feridas complexas
Published in
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/0100-69912017004008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimas André Milcheski, Marcelo Lima Portocarrero, Daniel Mamere Alvarez, Luiz Guilherme de Moraes Prado Mazuca, Araldo Ayres Monteiro, Rolf Gemperli

Abstract

to report the initial experience with Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with instillation in infected or contaminated complex wounds. the negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation used was V.A.C. Ulta with Veraflo instillation (Kinetic Concepts, Inc). The mode of operation was continuous with negative pressure set at 125 mmHg for two hours and instillation between the pauses. The instillation time was 20 minutes (contact time of the topical agent with the wound) and the instilled substance was 0.9% normal saline. After adequate preparation of the wound, it was covered with graft or flap. ten patients with complex or contaminated wounds were operated on. The mean number of NPWTi changes was 1.4, the mean number of surgeries was 2.4, the interval until complete wound coverage was 6.3 days, and the interval up to the time of discharge was 11.4 days. the comparison of the negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation with two previous studies (historical control) evidenced a shorter hospitalization time, favoring TPNi. This study had an initial character, making it necessary to conduct a randomized and controlled trial to confirm the efficacy of this therapy and verify its cost-effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#66
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,586
of 327,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them