↓ Skip to main content

The K-Punch Method: An Effective Diagnostic Approach for Hirschsprung Disease in Low- and Middle-Income Countries - A Case Series.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, January 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The K-Punch Method: An Effective Diagnostic Approach for Hirschsprung Disease in Low- and Middle-Income Countries - A Case Series.
Published in
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, January 2026
DOI 10.1590/0100-6991e-2026005725-en
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2026.
All research outputs
#23,913,139
of 34,151,039 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#118
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,497
of 374,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,151,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them