You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diferenciais de mortalidade por escolaridade da população adulta brasileira, em 2010
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-311x00019815 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lariça Emiliano da Silva, Flávio Henrique Miranda de Araújo Freire, Rafael Henrique Moraes Pereira |
| Abstract |
This study aims to estimate mortality differentials by level of schooling in the adult population in Brazil as a whole and its major geographic regions, according to sex and age. The article uses data from the item on household mortality in the 2010 Population Census conducted by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, combined with information on schooling of the household's reference person. The results show an important mortality differential by level of schooling, especially in males. Life expectancy in Brazilian men with a complete university education is 4.37 years more than the mean for the national male population and 6.27 years more than for males with less than a complete primary education. Among women, the educational gradient in life expectancy is less pronounced, with an additional 2.25 years for women with a complete university education, compared to women with less schooling. Mortality differentials according to schooling are more pronounced in the Northeast and Southeast regions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 50% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,860,971
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#319
of 1,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,473
of 319,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.