↓ Skip to main content

"Are men coming to the clinic now?!" Healthcare strategies for men

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
"Are men coming to the clinic now?!" Healthcare strategies for men
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, May 2016
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00060015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha Cristina Nunes Moreira, Romeu Gomes, Claudia Regina Ribeiro

Abstract

This is a qualitative study from the perspective of dialectical hermeneutics on healthcare strategies for men in the view of health professionals. The authors drew on 18 semi-structured interviews addressing male sexuality, men's healthcare, participation in prenatal care, and fatherhood. Three thematic lines were established, based on an understanding of the interviews as a whole, independently of both the specific themes mentioned above and the region. The themes provide structure for and are structured by ideas that traverse the various interviews. Themes of male sexuality associated with healthcare and fatherhood further evoke the private dimension, referred to the home's geographic boundaries. These ideas people the cultural repertoire on maleness; the novelty lies in unlinking sexuality from sexual relations and sexual health from transmission and contagion in the interpretation of our material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,090,466
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#773
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,612
of 319,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#17
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.