↓ Skip to main content

Literacia em saúde: tradução e validação de instrumento para pesquisa em promoção da saúde no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Literacia em saúde: tradução e validação de instrumento para pesquisa em promoção da saúde no Brasil
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, March 2017
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00179715
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and test the psychometric performance of a questionnaire to assess health literacy. Brazilian university students (n = 472) with a mean age of 22.7 (5.3) years participated in the study. The validities of the factor, convergent, and discriminant structure were tested using structural equations analysis. The 4-factors model showed only fair results, but was nevertheless the most adequate in terms of factor validity and proved invariant in independent samples. Convergent validity was only adequate for the factor "Search for Health Information", while discriminant validity was adequate for the factors "Search for Information" and "Understanding Information". Internal consistency showed adequate results on all the items. The second-order hierarchical model, although not totally adequate, slowly slightly higher fit indices and thus allowed calculating an overall health literacy score considering each item's best weight.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Librarian 4 4%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 44 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 45 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2025.
All research outputs
#3,206,305
of 29,485,101 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#98
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,608
of 332,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,485,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.