↓ Skip to main content

The myth of the allocative inefficiency of parliamentary amendments

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 295)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The myth of the allocative inefficiency of parliamentary amendments
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/0103-3352.2021.34.239518
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 63%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 10%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Unknown 25 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,357,618
of 34,306,620 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
#14
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,187
of 567,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,306,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 567,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.