↓ Skip to main content

Effect of castor cake and elephant grass composting on edaphic fauna

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of castor cake and elephant grass composting on edaphic fauna
Published in
Ciência Rural, July 2016
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150609
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2024.
All research outputs
#23,387,843
of 32,945,511 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#610
of 2,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,606
of 330,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#6
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,945,511 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.