You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of tubular subdermal and axial flaps in the correction of four cases of extensive lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20160869 |
| Authors |
Rafael Ricardo Huppes, Josiane Morais Pazzini, Andrigo Barboza De Nardi², Jorge Luiz Costa Castro, Cristiano Gomes, Arícia Gomes Sprada², Ana Lúcia Pascolli² |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#439
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,416
of 333,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.