You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of low and medium intake supplements in the growing phase of steers grazing in the tropical pasture and finished in feedlot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20220661 |
| Authors |
Regis Luis Missio, Saimon de Souza e Souza, Wagner Paris, Jefferson Felipe Cavazzana, Marcelo Machado Severo, Igor Kieling Severo, Julia Maria Poggere, Olmar Antônio Denardin Costa, Rusbel Raul Aspilcueta Borquis, Luis Fernando Glasenapp de Menezes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,923,501
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#118
of 2,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,380
of 362,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#14
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.