↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Comfort scale for relatives of people in critical states of health 1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Comfort scale for relatives of people in critical states of health 1
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/0104-1169.0180.2601
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kátia Santana Freitas, Igor Gomes Menezes, Fernanda Carneiro Mussi

Abstract

this methodological study aims to present the construct validity of the Comfort scale for family members of people in a critical state of health (ECONF). this is a methodological study. The sample was made up of 274 family members of adults receiving inpatient treatment in six Intensive Care Units (ICU) in the State of Bahía responded to 62 items distributed in 7 dimensions. The validation procedures adopted were based on the techniques of the Classical Test Theory. the analysis of dimensionality was undertaken through principal components analysis, a scale being obtained with 55 items distributed in four factors: Safety, Support, Family member-relative interaction and Integration with oneself and the everyday. The analysis of the items' , discriminative power, undertaken by the item-total correlation-coefficient showed a good relationship of the items with their respective factors. From the ECONF's reliability test, from the analysis of internal consistency, a raised Alpha Cronbach coefficient was obtained for the 4 factors and the general measurement. the comfort scale presented satisfactory psychometric parameters, thus constituting the first valid instrument for evaluating the comfort of family members of people in a critical state of health. The advance made by the study lies in its theoretical framework on comfort, and provides the health team with a scale based on empirical evidence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 16 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 49%