↓ Skip to main content

Primary health care assessment tools: a literature review and metasynthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary health care assessment tools: a literature review and metasynthesis
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, December 2014
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320141912.00572014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lislaine Aparecida Fracolli, Maria Fernanda Pereira Gomes, Fabiana Rodrigues Zequini Nabão, Mariana Souza Santos, Verusca Kelly Cappellini, Ana Cláudia Correa de Almeida

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,982,933
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#316
of 2,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,966
of 372,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.