↓ Skip to main content

Reflecting on twenty years of Masculinities: an interview with Raewyn Connell

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reflecting on twenty years of Masculinities: an interview with Raewyn Connell
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320172212.27242016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Raewyn Connell is very well known for her work on social theory and gender studies, and more specifically on masculinities. She was one of the founders of masculinities research and her 1995 book Masculinities is considered one of the most important references on the topic. Connell's concept of hegemonic masculinity has been particularly influential and has attracted much debate. She has written extensively about its applications to education, health, and violence prevention. Our conversation was about her trajectory as an intellectual, her commitment to gender justice, and the development of her work from Australia to the global scale.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 32%
Psychology 3 16%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2026.
All research outputs
#5,835,854
of 32,151,140 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#292
of 2,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,317
of 475,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,151,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.