↓ Skip to main content

Desigualdades em Saúde: uma perspectiva global

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Desigualdades em Saúde: uma perspectiva global
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, July 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017227.02742017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The objective of this article is to present health inequalities as a global problem which afflicts the populations of the poorest countries, but also those of the richest countries, and whose persistence represents one of the most serious and challenging health problems worldwide. Two components of global inequalities are highlighted: inequalities between groups within the same society, and inequalities between nations. The understanding that many of these inequalities are unjust, and therefore inequities, is largely derived from the inequalities that are identified between the various social groups of a given society. Inequalities between different societies and nations, while relevant and often of greater magnitude, are not always considered to be unjust. There have been several proposed solutions, which vary according to different theoretical interpretations and explanations. At the global level, the most plausible thesis has focused on improving global governance mechanisms. While that latter are attractive and have some arguments in their favor, they are insufficient because they do not incorporate an understanding of how the historical process of the constitution of the nations occurred and the importance of the position of each country in the global productive system.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 439 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 23 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 212 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 11%
Social Sciences 32 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 3%
Psychology 10 2%
Other 55 13%
Unknown 224 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#7,284,632
of 34,318,950 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#389
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,266
of 360,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,318,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.