You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emergencia del modelo de enfermería transmitido en las universidades españolas: una aproximación analítica a través de la Teoría Fundamentada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-81232018231.21132017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olga Rodrigo Pedrosa, Jordi Caïs, Cristina Monforte-Royo |
| Abstract |
The scope of this paper was to ascertain the meaning of the term "nursing" among teaching nurses at Spanish universities. The research was qualitative, and the strategy used was analytical induction. Sampling was theoretical and focused on the selection of extreme cases and the data collection technique was in-depth interviews. The analysis was carried out using the specific Grounded Theory technique. Strategies were established to ensure credibility, portability, confirmability and auditability. Based on the analysis of the data, three categories were identified that responded to the planned objective: it is a "human activity linked to motherhood," a "vocation to help others that some people have" and an "activity that takes care of the needs of others respecting their identity." It can be concluded that in Spanish universities a model of nurse is being transmitted where the proper role of care is inherent to the feminine gender and the vocation of service to others that some people have. This is the reason why the Spanish Royal Academy (RAE) only identifies the role of technical assistance to medicine as a professional element of nursing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,621,327
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#253
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,470
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.