You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novas práticas de atenção ao parto e os desafios para a humanização da assistência nas regiões sul e sudeste do Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-812320182311.07832016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricardo Motta Pereira, Giovanna de Oliveira Fonseca, Ana Célia Cirino Costa Pereira, Gabrielly Antunes Gonçalves, Roberta Amaral Mafra |
| Abstract |
The humanization of care in childbirth and the choice of performing cesarean or vaginal delivery have long been discussed in Brazil and worldwide. The complexities of the factors surrounding this issue range from the quality of obstetric care through to the significance of childbirth for women. A new proposal for humanization of delivery was introduced by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the objectives of which were to make changes to the current system of delivery practices regarding, access, care, quality and resolution, in order to make it a more human and less technical experience. The Sofia Feldman Hospital, in Belo Horizonte - MG, is a benchmark in the adoption of best practices in care during childbirth, according to the Brazilian National Health Agency. However, for the humanization to become a national reality, there are still many challenges to be overcome within the public health system and the private partnerships. The most important problems are related with the current education system that continues to prepare health professionals to act in an interventional way, focused on the physician figure. This study aims to provide an overview about the different humanized care practices focused on pregnancy and childbirth, conducted in southern and southeastern Brazil. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,314,812
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#190
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,706
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#11
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.