↓ Skip to main content

Orientações sobre amamentação na atenção básica de saúde e associação com o aleitamento materno exclusivo

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Orientações sobre amamentação na atenção básica de saúde e associação com o aleitamento materno exclusivo
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018234.10752016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article aims to analyze the association between guidance on breastfeeding in primary health care and exclusive breastfeeding. It involved a cross-sectional study conducted in 2013 in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, by means of interviews with 429 mothers of infants below six months of age in primary care units. We estimated adjusted prevalence ratios by Poisson regression. In the final model, the variables associated with the outcome (p ≤ 0.05) were retained. The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 50.1%. In multivariate analysis, guidance on exclusive breastfeeding in primary care was directly associated with the outcome (PR = 1.32). Maternal income < 1 minimum wage (PR = 0.77), previous breastfeeding experience for less than 6 months (PR = 0.73), not living with a partner (PR = 0.76), non-exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (PR = 0.78), alcohol consumption (OR = 0.57), guidance on pumping breast milk (PR = 0.53), pacifier use (PR = 0, 74) and baby's age in months (PR = 0.78) were associated inversely with the outcome. Guidance on exclusive breastfeeding favored it, while inadequate guidance and practices were associated with a lower prevalence of the outcome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 72 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 77 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,722,737
of 28,815,917 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#524
of 2,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,134
of 349,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,815,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.