↓ Skip to main content

Gestão da Educação e do Trabalho em Saúde no SUS: trinta anos de avanços e desafios

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gestão da Educação e do Trabalho em Saúde no SUS: trinta anos de avanços e desafios
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018236.06682018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Helena Machado, Francisco Rosemiro Guimarães Ximenes

Abstract

This article presents a historical analysis of work management and education in the healthcare field over the three decades since the creation of Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS, acronym in Portuguese). Using the sociology of professions as a frame of reference, it addresses the following topics: the health labor market; trends in healthcare employment; the healthcare workforce; and the regulation and dynamics of undergraduate programs in the health field. It analyzes each of the moments that characterize the area, from the pre-SUS period to the present day. The period has witnessed the following: a boom in health schools, largely in the private sector; an overall increase in the level of education of health professionals , an increase in regional inequity; an alarming increase in distance learning programs; an imbalance between labor supply and demand; the expansion of installed capacity; the municipalization of health employment; an increased focus on multiprofessional teams; and an increase in precarious work and informal contractual relationships and deterioration of pay levels.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Psychology 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 37 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,383,669
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#130
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,539
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#20
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.