| Title |
Medidas de distanciamento social no controle da pandemia de COVID-19: potenciais impactos e desafios no Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.10502020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Estela M. L. Aquino, Ismael Henrique Silveira, Julia Moreira Pescarini, Rosana Aquino, Jaime Almeida de Souza-Filho, Aline dos Santos Rocha, Andrea Ferreira, Audêncio Victor, Camila Teixeira, Daiane Borges Machado, Enny Paixão, Flávia Jôse Oliveira Alves, Flávia Pilecco, Greice Menezes, Ligia Gabrielli, Luciana Leite, Maria da Conceição Chagas de Almeida, Naiá Ortelan, Qeren Hapuk R. Ferreira Fernandes, Renzo Joel Flores Ortiz, Raquel Nunes Palmeira, Elzo Pereira Pinto, Erika Aragão, Luis Eugenio Portela Fernandes de Souza, Manoel Barral, Maria Glória Teixeira, Mauricio Lima Barreto, Maria Yury Ichihara, Raíza Tourinho dos Reis Silva Lima |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 57% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,031 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1031 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 171 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 137 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 43 | 4% |
| Researcher | 42 | 4% |
| Other | 135 | 13% |
| Unknown | 451 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 196 | 19% |
| Unknown | 506 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2025.
All research outputs
#1,955,590
of 32,911,318 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#37
of 2,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,332
of 452,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,911,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.