↓ Skip to main content

An improved experimental model for peripheral neuropathy in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improved experimental model for peripheral neuropathy in rats
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1590/1414-431x20122462
Pubmed ID
Authors

Q.M. Dias, A.C. Rossaneis, R.S. Fais, W.A. Prado

Abstract

A modification of the Bennett and Xie chronic constriction injury model of peripheral painful neuropathy was developed in rats. Under tribromoethanol anesthesia, a single ligature with 100% cotton glace thread was placed around the right sciatic nerve proximal to its trifurcation. The change in the hind paw reflex threshold after mechanical stimulation observed with this modified model was compared to the change in threshold observed in rats subjected to the Bennett and Xie or the Kim and Chung spinal ligation models. The mechanical threshold was measured with an automated electronic von Frey apparatus 0, 2, 7, and 14 days after surgery, and this threshold was compared to that measured in sham rats. All injury models produced significant hyperalgesia in the operated hind limb. The modified model produced mean ± SD thresholds in g (19.98 ± 3.08, 14.98 ± 1.86, and 13.80 ± 1.00 at 2, 7, and 14 days after surgery, respectively) similar to those obtained with the spinal ligation model (20.03 ± 1.99, 13.46 ± 2.55, and 12.46 ± 2.38 at 2, 7, and 14 days after surgery, respectively), but less variable when compared to the Bennett and Xie model (21.20 ± 8.06, 18.61 ± 7.69, and 18.76 ± 6.46 at 2, 7, and 14 days after surgery, respectively). The modified method required less surgical skill than the spinal nerve ligation model.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 13%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 15%