↓ Skip to main content

Development of the endocrine pancreas and novel strategies for β-cell mass restoration and diabetes therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of the endocrine pancreas and novel strategies for β-cell mass restoration and diabetes therapy
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1590/1414-431x20154363
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.L. Márquez-Aguirre, A.A. Canales-Aguirre, E. Padilla-Camberos, H. Esquivel-Solis, N.E. Díaz-Martínez

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus represents a serious public health problem owing to its global prevalence in the last decade. The causes of this metabolic disease include dysfunction and/or insufficient number of β cells. Existing diabetes mellitus treatments do not reverse or control the disease. Therefore, β-cell mass restoration might be a promising treatment. Several restoration approaches have been developed: inducing the proliferation of remaining insulin-producing cells, de novo islet formation from pancreatic progenitor cells (neogenesis), and converting non-β cells within the pancreas to β cells (transdifferentiation) are the most direct, simple, and least invasive ways to increase β-cell mass. However, their clinical significance is yet to be determined. Hypothetically, β cells or islet transplantation methods might be curative strategies for diabetes mellitus; however, the scarcity of donors limits the clinical application of these approaches. Thus, alternative cell sources for β-cell replacement could include embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and mesenchymal stem cells. However, most differentiated cells obtained using these techniques are functionally immature and show poor glucose-stimulated insulin secretion compared with native β cells. Currently, their clinical use is still hampered by ethical issues and the risk of tumor development post transplantation. In this review, we briefly summarize the current knowledge of mouse pancreas organogenesis, morphogenesis, and maturation, including the molecular mechanisms involved. We then discuss two possible approaches of β-cell mass restoration for diabetes mellitus therapy: β-cell regeneration and β-cell replacement. We critically analyze each strategy with respect to the accessibility of the cells, potential risk to patients, and possible clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,755,994
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#226
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,148
of 276,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.