↓ Skip to main content

Physical training for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical training for asthma
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/1516-3180.20141323t1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V. Carson, Madhu G. Chandratilleke, Joanna Picot, Malcom P. Brinn, Adrian J. Esterman A., Brian J. Smith

Abstract

People with asthma may show less tolerance to exercise due to worsening asthma symptoms during exercise or other reasons such as deconditioning as a consequence of inactivity. Some may restrict activities as per medical advice or family influence and this might result in reduced physical fitness. Physical training programs aim to improve physical fitness, neuromuscular coordination and self confidence. Subjectively, many people with asthma report that they are symptomatically better when fit, but results from trials have varied and have been difficult to compare because of different designs and training protocols. Also, as exercise can induce asthma, the safety of exercise programmes needs to be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 223 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 14 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 34%
Sports and Recreations 30 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 61 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,218,701
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#6
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,194
of 321,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.