↓ Skip to main content

Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, January 2013
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1157
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), increases with age, and the number of affected patients is expected to increase worldwide in the next decades. Accurately understanding the etiopathogenic mechanisms of these diseases is a crucial step for developing disease-modifying drugs able to preclude their emergence or at least slow their progression. Animal models contribute to increase the knowledge on the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases. These models reproduce different aspects of a given disease, as well as the histopathological lesions and its main symptoms. The purpose of this review is to present the main animal models for AD, PD, and Huntington's disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Neuroscience 22 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 45 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#24,351,887
of 33,928,890 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
#646
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,770
of 345,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,928,890 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.