↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of inpatients with severe mental illness: a naturalistic descriptive study

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcomes of inpatients with severe mental illness: a naturalistic descriptive study
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, April 2016
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriela L. Nuernberg, Fernanda L. Baeza, Marcelo P. Fleck, Neusa S. Rocha

Abstract

To describe and evaluate the response and predictors of remission during inpatient treatment in a psychiatric unit in a general hospital based on symptomatology, functionality, and quality of life (QoL). Patients were admitted to a psychiatric unit in a tertiary general hospital in Brazil from June 2011 to December 2013 and included in the study if they met two of the severe mental illness (SMI) criteria: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ≤ 50 and duration of service contact ≥ 2 years. Patients were assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity Scale , GAF, the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument - Abbreviated version (WHOQOL-Bref), and specific diagnostic scales. A total of 239 patients were included. BPRS mean scores were 25.54±11.37 at admission and 10.96±8.11 at discharge (p < 0.001). Patients with manic episodes (odds ratio: 4.03; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-14.30; p = 0.03) were more likely to achieve remission (CGI ≤ 2 at discharge) than those with depressive episodes. Mean length of stay was 28.95±19.86 days. All QoL domains improved significantly in the whole sample. SMI patients had marked improvements in symptomatic and functional measures during psychiatric hospitalization. Patients with manic episodes had higher chance of remission according to the CGI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Psychology 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 23 32%