↓ Skip to main content

Patient safety culture in a university hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient safety culture in a university hospital
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, August 2018
DOI 10.1590/1518-8345.2257.3014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taís Freire Galvão, Marcélia Célia Couteiro Lopes, Carmen Conceição Carrilho Oliva, Maria Elizete de Almeida Araújo, Marcus Tolentino Silva

Abstract

to assess patient safety culture in a university hospital. cross-sectional study with data collection through the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture applied in electronic device. A total of 381 employees were interviewed, corresponding to 46% of the sum of eligible professionals. Data were analyzed descriptively. the Cronbach's alpha was used to calculate the frequency and reliability. most were women (73%) from the nursing area (50%) and with direct contact with patients (82%). The composites related to "teamwork within units" (58%, α=0.68), "organizational learning - continuous improvement" (58%, α=0.63), "supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting patient safety" (56%, α=0.73) had higher positive responses. Nine composites had low positive responses, with emphasis on "nonpunitive response to error" (18%, α=0.40). Only the item "in this unit, people treat each other with respect" had positive response above 70%. The patient safety assessment in the work unit was positive for 36% of employees, however only 22% reported events in past year. the findings revealed weaknesses in the safety culture at the hospital, with emphasis on culpability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Lecturer 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 64 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 68 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#613
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,172
of 341,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.