You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of music therapy on stress in chemically dependent people: a quasi-experimental study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1518-8345.2456.3115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gunnar Glauco De Cunto Taets, Rafael Tavares Jomar, Angela Maria Mendes Abreu, Marcia Alves Marques Capella |
| Abstract |
to evaluate the effect of music therapy on the stress of chemically dependent people. quasi-experimental study conducted at a philanthropic institution with 18 chemically dependent people undergoing treatment. Salivary cortisol (stress hormone) was collected in three moments: before, 60 minutes after, and 120 minutes after a music therapy group intervention. Statistical analysis adopted a significance level of p < 0.05 and used the Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric tests. after 60 minutes of intervention, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean salivary cortisol levels (p < 0.001). A reduction was also noted after 120 minutes, but without statistical significance (p = 0.139). a single session of 60 minutes of group music therapy was able to reduce stress (salivary cortisol levels) of chemically dependent people. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Psychology | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,915,858
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#16
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,528
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#5
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.